If you cannot decide at the moment, go with a form property. It shouldn't be hard to refactor code later if necessary.

>So, you'd advise passing in the parameter, even though it's in the same class (for now), so that if you did go back and extract the method out to a BO, at least most of the architucture for that design would already be in place. ???
>
>I kinda like that approach, but it sure could look silly when you are passing in info that the method could easily get from the form. It is at least a hybrid approach until the method is moved out of the form and into a BO.
>
>It does at least break the depency on what the form property is named. Well, actually it MOVES the requirement of know what the form property is named from the method out to every method that calls the target method. So, then I'm maintining many calling methods, when I could just concentrate it all in the called method. Rats! I still can't decide!