>>>>>I believe, IIRC, that your initial version showed
who viewed the message. And I remember that some expressed concern about privacy issue; which makes sense. I think what Matt is saying is to show how many times a message has been viewed without showing the names or IDs. This would not invade any body's privacy.
>>>>
>>>>I would have to add this one into the next survey. lol
>>>
>>>You know, you make a good point about making sure not to upset some people. I can even see now (without naming names *g*) that some will raise issue that their messages are not viewed as often as some others.
>>
>>I wonder if anyone has any idea what the point of this is. I wondered what people would use this information for in a previous post, but I never got an answer from anyone - not even Matt who suggested it in the first place.
>>
>>If there's no advertising revenue, then who cares.
>
>My guess is the point is narcissism.
I think when people submit a question and there is no response, they would like to know if it has been at least viewed since that is a standard feature on other forums.
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"