>>>I wonder if anyone has any idea what the point of this is. I wondered what people would use this information for in a previous post, but I never got an answer from anyone - not even Matt who suggested it in the first place.
>>>
>>>If there's no advertising revenue, then who cares.
>>
>>It helps to give you a context when you don't receive much in the way of responses. If you see 2 views and no responses, well you probably need to be more patient (or your subject line is horrible and people are just skipping it). If you see 30 views and no responses either you're question is too vague/hard to understand or no one knows. Either way you have at least some idea on how to proceed - add additional info, rephrase the question, or post elsewhere.
>
>Well.... I suppose... Seems to me though that after a few days of not getting a reply, you can pretty much surmise exactly the same possibilities.
>
>Anyway, like I said, if people want it, fine. It doesn't impinge on my use of the system, so it really doesn't matter. To me it's a useless statistic, but if it's useful to others, then I guess it's worthwhile.

I think there should be no twit filter. Sorry, couldn't resist....

>>(Yeah, yeah, I can think of a bunch of other reasons why you might not receive a response - those were just examples.)