>VFP is dead as a technology for developing modern solutions; to think otherwise is foolhardy.
>
>Some might assert that the combination of Etecnologica NET compiler and VFP Developer Studio (check it out) means that VFP code can produce the same sort of assemblies as the language you prefer. Is that modern enough? ;-) You don't even need a copy of VFP installed any more.
>
>Anyway, if people want a UT VFP mag, maybe somebody needs to approach Michel to offer to be Editor. If nobody does then I guess that "dead" isn't such a bad term. ;-)

You can paint a horse pretty colors, but underneath its still a horse. I doubt very seriously that etecnologia will be able to take full advantage of all that .net offers using VFP as the source...

Will it write WPF apps? Silverlight? I think it'll be handicapped out of the shoot and very few people will use it. Time would be better spent learning c# or VB.net..