I agree with you. Nevertheless the delivery of the knock out will be difficult with out a refueling stop unless the Israelis are training kamakazi stike eagle or hornet missions. And we know that AWAKS will see them anyway. I was delighted to hear today that Mr. Netenyahu will be PM. I think I'll go out and buy a gas mask, a helmet and a bottle of single malt scotch. (Not necessarily in that order)

>>The US has already said no.
>
>And I'm sure the Israelis have already said "Thank you for your opinion." <s> My personal feeling is if Netanyahu feels something is necessary for Israel's survival he will fall back on the old adage "It is easier to seek forgiveness than permisson."
>
>>
>>>I doubt they would get US approval for anything overt.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>Well as the North Koreans have demonstrated you get a lot more respect with one than without one.
>>>>
>>>>The North Koreans aren't a Shahab-5 missile away from Tel Aviv and making "erase Israel" noises. If the Koreans were to start talking about how they want to wipe out China they would quickly get an order of Chinese takeout - lots of stick, hold the carrots - and we'd be talking about where North Korea used to be.
>>>>
>>>>Let's review : Iraq - Osirak - boom. Iraq - Gerard Bull - super cannon - boom (in that case the boom was in the part of Bull's brain that invented super cannons). Syria - Tall al-Abyad - boom. (and I'll betcha there have been a whole lot of quiet little booms that don't make the papers)
>>>>
>>>>I am never sure why people don't think the Israelis aren't serious about this survival thing ...
>>>>
>>>>And Netanyahu isn't a dovish softy, like Begin <g>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>BTW there's a series showing on BBC now "Iran and the west" try and watch it. In part 2 there's one quite funny bit where the US team fail to recognise which Iranian is sitting on the other side of the table at the UN. Secondly the Us failed to respond to Khatami's overtures becuase he didn't deal with the hardliners in Iran, failing completely to see that his position was tenuous and could have been helped with a little give on the US side. And who caused the US to take the hard line, the security services. Well done guys remember to try and see the big picture some time.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>This may be a case where having a single bomb may be a lot more dangerous to Iran than having no bomb at all.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>They say that in the ruins of that mysterious place in Syria on the Turkish border than mysteriously got bombed last year they found traces of graphite used in nuclear processing ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>And Netanyahu will soon form a government ... no more "Mr. Nice Guy" ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f367aada-fec8-11dd-b19a-000077b07658.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Snippet:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Iran has built up a stockpile of enough enriched uranium for one nuclear bomb, United Nations officials acknowledged on Thursday.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In a development that comes as the Obama administration is drawing up its policy on negotiations with Tehran over its nuclear programme, UN officials said Iran had produced more nuclear material than previously thought.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>If such a quantity were further enriched it could produce more than 20kg of fissile material – enough for a bomb.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>“It appears that Iran has walked right up to the threshold of having enough low enriched uranium to provide enough raw material for a single bomb,” said Peter Zimmerman, a former chief scientist of the US Arms Control and Disarmament Agency
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Well, there's still a ways to go...