>You misunderstood (or I wasn't clear). What I meant was it'll cost them to bring this to market and I don't think they can recoup that cost through sales to existing vfp people.
>
>Maybe they should drop the "VFP" label and market it as a NET productivity tool using an abstracting 4GL that allows you to compile to multiple standards and to re-compile to use the latest technology as it appears.

I assume you are being sarcastic.