>I worked with JPG images in VFP3/5 applications. The applications utilized LeadTool OCX to handle images. Most of apps handled images stored in tables (general fields), though some used stand-alone files. I've heard that VFP6 has better image-handling abilities itself, but I didn't check it yet.
>
>So you had huge table (over 150MB)? I stored 54 images and it was 154MB! That was Access 97, but VFP would take a lot of space also.

As I remember, one middle-size/quality jpg image is 30K, i.e. 54 images will take around 1.5M. If you care about diskspace, note that stand-alone files will take the same space as FPT file(s).

>Did you understand my question in the orginal message?

I guess yes, but if you will specify what exactly the question, I will appreciate :).