If you don't want to get any replies from me then use twit filter. It is simple and does not require any cheap public plays. At the same time I have full right to ask any questions addressed to any poster on this forum. It is fine as long as I comply with UT Terms of Service; no additional rules.
I think it is quite indicative how differently you reacted to my question and to the same (literally) questions coming from other members.

>Please try to undersatnd what I try to say Here. When I wrote "comment" I meant "other facts", which again refers to messages and threads which are months old. I never added any "facts" in THIS thread, and I never wrote that I did.
>
>My postings in this thread have been one comment (to Sergey) and a few replies to postings addressed to me. You jumped into this thread and implied that I had written something which I had clearly not written, and asked me to defend it. You have no right to ask ANYTHING from me, period. Please accept my wish to NOT get any more replies from you, unless you realize that you got this all wrong from the start.
>
>NB! To be honest, you and I agree on more than you may believe, but I don't try to push my POVs down other people's throat. Everyone has the right to mean and say whatever they want without getting bullied with. And nobody, except politicians, can be forced to justify their words.
>
>>It is not true. I did not mention your old postings from other threads. All my comments were directly related, actually literal citations from this thread.
>>In regard to your threat to stop talking to me, it is solely your discretion. By the way, inventing on spot, that you doing it because I am "extremely offensive" is totally untrue. You will not find one offensive word in my replies to you. You just use convenient excuse to avoid argumentative discourse.
>>
>>>Edward,
>>>
>>>this is probably the last time I will ever respond to you, since I find you extremely offensive. Please reread what I have written in my other messages in this thread. Repeat until you understand what I have written. If you still don't get it, I will repeat what I wrote to Jos, namely that the "comments" you mention were some of my old postings in other threads.
>>>
>>>
>>>>You wrote to Sergey: 'People who write this kind of stuff are automatically added to my "no reason to waste my time on this guy" list.".
>>>>What kind of 'other facts' you added here?
>>>>
>>>>>Check again and you will see that I replied to Sergey, I don't feel any obligation to defend what I write to someone else. My comment was based solely on what John wrote in this thread, and has nothing to do with what else he has written before.
>>>>>
>>>>>>Are you sure that you wrote any "other facts"? The only thing I see is a judgment that talking to John is below your level.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>When someone write a bunch of onesided "facts" I reserve the right to write a bunch of other "facts". That does not mean that I want to take any part in the discussion as such, I just want to add some comment to create a balance. I find it equally boring to discuss with someone who agrees with me 100% as to discuss with someone who does not agree with me at all. As a matter of fact I have family members who just love to discuss and argue, so I have had more than enough of that many years ago. I normally try to avoid getting into a discussion unless it's something which is important for me persoanally.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Except to comment that you aren't going to comment, right? ;)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I have met John many times, and know that he's a good guy. But a good guy can have POVs which are quite different from mine. And as I wrote, I don't waste my time discussing these matters with them. That doesn't mean that I don't respect them or like them. It's just that I let them speak out without making any public comments myself.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>John's a good guy and generally worth listening to. He was just a little fired up there.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>People who write this kind of stuff are automatically added to my "no reason to waste my time on this guy" list.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>What it has to do with VFP? There's Chatter forum on UT for sh*t like that.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Did anyone watch Obama's address to Congress?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>OK, now this dude had moved into the category of outright liar. No earmarks? Hahahahah....the average American will burp, pull the tab on a new beer, and move on. But the truth is that the latest spending bill has between $4 Bn and $8 Bn in earmarks depending the interpreter,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Now they're pushing through a bill to give the District of Columbia voting representatives. Seems fair, right? But it's UNCONSTITUTIONAL, The only way legally to do this is through a Constitutional Amendment. But, golly gee, that would be inconvenient to Congress do we'll just overlook that aspect.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>All you idiots who voted for this guy without knowing what he realy stood for and are singing his praises still are clueless or ... I dunno ... fascists. He's boiling the frogs, folks. If you don't know the analogy look it up.