>>>>>>Everyone is finally taking Suze Orman's advice :o) Interestingly, in the most recent (over the past 3 months) talks she's given that I've heard, she's stressed that the overall condition of the economy is more important than individual economic well-being and she's stressed that folks not follow her standard advice but rather *buy buy buy!*
>>>>>
>>>>>Thats a reason for making sure government spending to boost the economy goes to poor people. They will spend it because they (depending on your political viewpoint) have to for their survival or are feckless layabouts buying beer etc.
>>>>
>>>>You forget another essential ingredient of the Plan. Firstly, government should make everyone poor, just to have sufficient number of people supporting (through spending or other ways, depending on your political viewpoint) its way of moving to new, fairer society.
>>>
>>>replace the word "fairer" with "more equal" then I think you have point.
>>
>>Actually, I tried to use classical wording. To be precise, I was unsure if it should be translated as 'fairer' or 'more just', but it can't be 'more equal'; the latter is too plain, nothing heroic inherent to brave people building new society.
>
>there's nothing "fair" or "just" about what they're doing either. Redistributing wealth is all about making us all equal. Except for those that belong to the party.

It seems that you are not familiar with newspeak. I suspect that you got South Korean heritage, not North Korean one. It is Ok, "free American press" will teach you and other, uneducated in this respect, people how things should be called in new, politically correct (don't confuse with old politically correct, it was not correct enough by tomorrow's terms) world.