Hmm. If DC were retroceded back to the states then this would not be a Constitutional issue I suppose. But that's not what they are doing.

>>Did anyone watch Obama's address to Congress?
>>
>>OK, now this dude had moved into the category of outright liar. No earmarks? Hahahahah....the average American will burp, pull the tab on a new beer, and move on. But the truth is that the latest spending bill has between $4 Bn and $8 Bn in earmarks depending the interpreter,
>>
>>Now they're pushing through a bill to give the District of Columbia voting representatives. Seems fair, right? But it's UNCONSTITUTIONAL, The only way legally to do this is through a Constitutional Amendment. But, golly gee, that would be inconvenient to Congress do we'll just overlook that aspect.
>
>I don't think that's quite correct. As I understand it, DC could be retroceded back to Maryland by an agreement between Congress and the State of Maryland. Then DC citizens would have full voting rights restored and no amendment to the constitution required.
>
>If I were a DC citizen, I'd much prefer a different option. Remember the Boston Tea Party? I think DC citizens should be excluded from having to pay tax since they don't have proper representation.
>
>>
>>All you idiots who voted for this guy without knowing what he realy stood for and are singing his praises still are clueless or ... I dunno ... fascists. He's boiling the frogs, folks. If you don't know the analogy look it up.