>SNIP
>>If C# is going dynamic and that means what I think it means, I think it would be a huge mistake. I LIKE the type safety which is core to the language.
>
>This?
>
>http://blogs.msdn.com/cburrows/archive/2008/10/27/c-dynamic.aspx

I don't have a problem with that. If I am reading correctly, C# will still enforce type safety except when you specifically say you don't want it with the new Dynamic type.