>>>>Since when is NET 'proven' technology ?!? Are you talking about NET 1.1 , or latest 3.5 which is... how old ?
>>>
>>>Are you kidding? .NET is clearly proven technology - it's been around since circa 2000 and used all around the world in a vast number of situations. That is, unless you are looking through VFP tinted glasses.
>>>
>>>It's totally laughable that you can even utter such nonsense.
>>
>>Not nearly as laughable as calling a product that has been running mission critical systems for 20 years unproven...
>
>Who actually said that Tracy?
>
>Maybe you should just take away the Fox bias and look at what he said. If you cannot see that at this stage, .NET is clearly proven technology, irrespective as to whether it has not been around for twenty years, then the discussion is pointless because it is devoid of technical merit and based only on emotion.
>
>I code in both platforms. I have no axe to grind either way.

Re: Will eTecnologia succeed? Message #1384097

I too code in .net everyday and the app is actually an extremely mission critical system. I never stated that .net was not proven technology or unreliable in anyway. I actually believe quite the opposite. I was referring to John's comment on VFP and eTech's being unproven. I interpreted it wrong?