>>>I too code in .net everyday and the app is actually an extremely mission critical system. I never stated that .net was not proven technology or unreliable in anyway. I actually believe quite the opposite. I was referring to John's comment on VFP and eTech's being unproven. I interpreted it wrong?
>>
>>To be fair to John, I took that as calling E-Tech's product unproven. I think if he was talking about straight VFP he might have used a different adjective.
>
>That makes sense, however, how is it any different than other products that compile to IL like those here:
>
>http://www.dotnetpowered.com/languages.aspx
>http://articles.techrepublic.com.com/5100-10878_11-6094937.html
>
>or does ET not work under the same principle?

I don't know - I haven't looked into it at all and doubt I will.