>>I am not a Rush Limbaugh fan. Still, I think he is more concerned with policy than Obama the man or President. I understand him to imply that he didn't want socialist policies to succeed. It will be interesting to see if they do. That could really change our future and this country.
>
>He may be the voice of that segment who'd rather see cat's kitten drowned because the cat is of wrong color. Just like Miloševic's MPs who would say to the Demokratska, "that's a nice bill you have prepared; too bad it's yours so we'll have to reject it". Or, one old guy who worked with my mom, and never understood a joke, because he was busy scanning the first half of it for any chance that it may be a joke on him, and then couldn't follow the second half.
>
>IOW, just like I have changed my mind on gun ownership - despite my utter dislike for some of the proponents - so should this segment judge any proposal on its own merits, not on its color, red or purple or whatever.

In this case, I don't think who presented the policy has anything to do with it. I just don't see Rush or anyone else on the far-right or even libertarians supporting any type of nationalized health care even if it had come from the Republicans (which would never happen). But wait......did you actually write that you changed your mind on gun ownership?!!!!!! Stop the presses!