>>>>>If I had 1000 values that I need to loop through (visit every node sequentially, not skip around) that needed very fast processing and they do not need disk storage... which would be faster... an array or a cursor?
>>>>
>>>>Cursor.
>>>
>>>Wow really? I've never done any testing, but I assumed the array would be faster. I suppose a quick test with the coverage profiler would tell us for sure.
>>
>>Tables are fastest
>
>VFP can read/write the disk faster than memory?

Yes - And I got that info from Ken Levi.