Please reread my last message. I wrote that Seek and Seek() have always behaved this way. Feel free to make a fuzz about it. Personally I prefer to accept it.

>Well, let's not speak about SQL. Have you tested my last code portion with your lovely Seek() ?
>You see, I'm not speaking about any usefullness or comfort of SEEK and SEEK().
>Though only one great difference is usage of 2 code lines :
>
>SEEK x ORDER TAG cOrder in cTable
>? FOUND(cTable)
>
>instead of one :
>
>? SEEK(x,cTable,cOrder)
>
>My post was "Why SEEK doesn't return error message ?" . Or you prefer to change the title of thread into
>"How to use SELECT-SQL instead SEEK" ?