Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
A.I.G. -- what gall!
Message
De
16/03/2009 15:53:13
Walter Meester
HoogkarspelPays-Bas
 
 
À
16/03/2009 15:32:38
Information générale
Forum:
Finances
Catégorie:
Autre
Divers
Thread ID:
01388473
Message ID:
01388522
Vues:
55
Can you eleborate on $2000B go out in smoke?


>Why not to ask you the obvious question? It is cheap, imho, to show outrage in regard to $1B expense when $2000B go out in smoke. One peculiar feature of the process is that the outrage is expressed by the same person(s) who write off/endorse these trillions. By the way, bonuses are not received by executives only; low-level employees get them too. On the other side, government payroll also consists of executives and low-level employees getting different salaries/bonuses/perks.
>
>>You're quite the provocateur, aren't you?
>>
>>If you can name a government employee who got a bonus in the millions last year, I will be happy to discuss this further. That's not blindly defending government employees, or blindly bashing the private sector, but your "point" is a ludicrous stretch. Have a nice day.
>>
>>>Are you not concerned about bonuses/salaries paid to all government employees who rip-off "taxpayers" to the tune of $1500-2000 billon/year?
>>>
>>>>This was the lead story in yesterday's New York Times, which I got around to reading at lunch time today. I see in today's headlines online that President Obama is trying to get payment of these bonuses blocked. The article makes it sound like that may not be possible legally, but boy, is this aggravating. We are bailing these bozos out to the tune of $180 billion and they are paying themselves huge bonuses? And to the exact business unit that caused all the problems? Truly unbelievable.
>>>>
>>>>http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/15/business/15AIG.html
>>>>
>>>>Here is my favorite part ---
>>>>
>>>>A.I.G., nearly 80 percent of which is now owned by the government, defended its bonuses, arguing that they were promised last year before the crisis and cannot be legally canceled. In a letter to Mr. Geithner, Edward M. Liddy, the government-appointed chairman of A.I.G., said at least some bonuses were needed to keep the most skilled executives.
>>>>
>>>>“We cannot attract and retain the best and the brightest talent to lead and staff the A.I.G. businesses — which are now being operated principally on behalf of American taxpayers — if employees believe their compensation is subject to continued and arbitrary adjustment by the U.S. Treasury,” he wrote Mr. Geithner on Saturday.

>>>>
>>>>Thank goodness they are retaining that best and brightest talent. Just think how much of a mess they could have created if they were not in such able hands!
>>>>
>>>>Grrrr.....
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform