>Applying your logics, we could separate top-level government offcials, also relatively healthy financially, and put them on $1 salary for the remainder of the year. Good idea?
>Basically, one should not express too much outrage about $150M, when trillions fly around to sink hole. Is it not something that called "red herring"?

You're saying that this "red herring" has a number! I might call that number sometime--one would think it would be unlisted. But hey! You not only know grammar, you know numbers too. That's clearly evident now based on your special bonus knowledge. So tell me, how might these numbers compare with the money earned by the Hollywood crowd we've discussed previously ? Is it as much? More? Pale by comparison? Or, yuk-yuk, shall I say 'pail'? ;-) (Get it? I'm sure you could figure that one out.) roflmao