If investment banks and holding companies remained separate the CDSs never would've become so pervasive.But you have to ask why bankers piled up a mountain of risk that in hindsight could not possibly have a happy ending. Obviously investment-grade US mortgages had a very low default rate, but you'd have to ask whether and why the bankers who converted shonky mortgages to investment grade using the instruments you describe, believed it could be true. Either they didn't believe, in which case it's hard not to describe the behavior as fraud, or they did believe because they thought they had evidence from tools like Li's Gaussian copula formulae. In that case they were merely incompetent.
To blame government for this faulty behavior seems like blaming government for drunk driving because they relaxed Prohibition.
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1