Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Natasha Richardson -- this is sounding ominous
Message
From
19/03/2009 11:03:52
 
 
To
19/03/2009 10:51:13
General information
Forum:
Movies
Category:
Actors
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01389306
Message ID:
01389532
Views:
58
Other than policing their usage and the disposing of the old helmets, all the other costs would have to be assumed by the skier, which is OK by me.

I agree with you that it may lead to more reckless skiing for some skier, but I think that on the whole, the number of injuries/deaths will fall. We did enforce the wear of the safety belt here a while ago (in the '70s?) and I didn't see many drivers drive faster because of that. The ones who drive recklessly would have done it safety belt or not.

>Forcing everyone to wears helmets is a simple cost/benefit decision. How much money would helmets save soceity vs. how much money would it cost to produce those helmets, buy them, carry them around, police their usage, and the cost of disposing of all those old helmets, etc, etc. Think it through…
>
>Furthermore, the wearing of helmets, like the driving of large 4x4 trucks, can actually lead to more reckless skiing (driving) in the belief that we are safer and hence can go faster.
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform