>Yeah, that was my thinking too when I saw the "T" file missing, but then I realized about the roll up of the fixes being included. The fix is in the works and coming soon.

Makes me wonder, because the readme.txt says vfp9t.dll is not changed and therefore is intentionally not included.
But in fact it would make things easier, if it was included in the latest hotfix just for the convenience not to need two hotfixes
to put togehter the latest VFP version.

How will it be fixed?
Will vfp9t.dll Version 9.0.0.6602 be included in the third Hotfix and within the vfp9runtime.msm or will they simply add a new vfp9t.dll Version 9.0.0.7423 just to make the version number consitent, although quoting 968409_ReadMe.txt nothing changed from vfp9t.dll 6602?

Bye, Olaf.