Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Scary if true
Message
 
 
General information
Forum:
Finances
Category:
Budget
Title:
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01393480
Message ID:
01393715
Views:
65
>>>>Perhaps somebody should write to this fellow to tell him that TARP is not manna from heaven, it is a taxpayer bail-out of an industry that broke itself. Individual banks may not have needed $, but plenty of $ in the banking system reduces the risk of widespread bank runs that not even the best-run bank is likely to survive. As for control: if any commercial entity ponies up the cash to rescue a failing entity, the first thing they do is take control and institute emergency measures to repair whatever caused the failure- including supervision or replacement of current management. In this respect, government seems fairly benign. IMHO the objection is to the label "government" not to the idea that a rescuing investor is expected to take control, especially of an entity that needed saving after it screwed up.
>>>
>>>I agree with your premise that a bailed out company has zero say about controlling influence from the bailor. The issue however is in regards to private entities which were forced to accept TARP money in the first place and are being refused when attempting to return the money. With a number of banks this more closely resembles a hostile takeover rather than a rescue.
>>
>>Do you truly believe the government is interested in a hostile takeover of banks, in controlling the banking system? To me this seems like a conspiracy theory of the first order. Black helicopter kind of stuff.
>
>It's not a matter of thinking it, it has already happened. The banks who've accepted or been forced to accept TARP money are now subject to the whims of the FED, the Congress and Obama's administration. No black helicopters necessary, just a pen.
>
>My opinion is subject to change once the big banks are allowed to repay, until that time I consider them under the control of a hostile entity.

It was the phrase "hostile takeover" that I disagreed with. The government is not out to take over banks IMO. They are putting restrictions and oversight on those which receive bailout money. I consider that entirely fitting and wish it had happened before now.
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform