>>>>For me it returns the first 2000 results sorted in descending order
>>>
>>>Then, I believe, this would be the correct behavior.
>>
>>No it is not, based on my tests. See Naomi's message on the syntax...
>>
>>Update: did you just change it? I just logged out, back in, and now it seems to be returning select top 2000 * from whatever order by desc
>
>What do you see in Michel's online status, BTW? Everyone else seems to be correct, say, you have 3 diamonds.
One star.
.·*´¨)
.·`TCH
(..·*
010000110101001101101000011000010111001001110000010011110111001001000010011101010111001101110100
"When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser." - Socrates
Vita contingit, Vive cum eo. (Life Happens, Live With it.)
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away." -- author unknown
"De omnibus dubitandum"
