>>I've no idea what you're saying.
>
>On all the tests I have done, the ordering is as per what you say. I was not able to simulate the situation some members are having where the order is not properly set. I will see later on about the adjustment needed so it will be in the proper order for everyone.
Michel,
The order is correct but the query itself returns 2000 oldest hits instead of 2000 newest ones.
--sb--