I think it was Kevin McNeish who said, "Things that are easy in VFP are hard in .NET. Things that are hard in VFP are easy in .NET".

By .NET 10, so you mean 2010 or version 10 (which is many years down the road). If 2010, you should use the proper numbers to avoid confusion:

Visual Studio 2010
.NET Framework 4.0
C# 4.0
VB.NET 10.0

The coverage tools would be part of Visual Studio, but not .NET.

>I just think it strange that things VFP has had for years ( at a simple but usable level) are completely missing in all but the upper levels of .Net distributions. I understand this is going to be in .NET 10 along with some other goodies but we really need something now.