>>>>>You're right. But, the world is over populated with humans and mother nature doesn't like over population, so there is a culling somewhere in our future. This may not be it, but it'll be along eventually.
>>>>>
>>>>>>Hmmm, I thought SARS was going to kill us all. And if we lived through that, the Bird Flu would finish off the survivors.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Seal your doors and windows then read all about it here.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20090424/swine_flu_090424/20090424?hub=Health
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>We're resilient little thing Grady. Keep it in perspective, 100 dead is not a lot.
>>>
>>>You are correct. It is too early to know which way the flu will go. Just keep washing your hands and don't touch your face even if you get one of those teeny itchy spots on your upper lip, cheek or nose. I also think that over population, creating increasing demand for heat, power and transportation, is a significant contributer to the global warming phenominon.
>>
>>Actually I will carry on as normal. The media is whipping this up to a large degree.
>
>Actually, I'm delighted that they're taking it seriously. I've read about the 1918 epidemic and one of the factors in the large number of deaths was how slowly it was recognized as a big deal. (There were plenty of other factors, but there was a lot of denial at first.) Maybe this isn't the big deal epidemic, but a couple of things they're saying make me think it might be, especially that the ones who are dying aren't the old and the sick, but young, formerly healthy people. That's what happened in 1918.
>
>Tamar

We do not knkow, so appropriate caution if necessary.