>I've seen the named and optional arguments in c# 4.0, and it may offer some relief. However, there are rules that must be taken into consideration:
>
>http://codebetter.com/blogs/matthew.podwysocki/archive/2008/10/28/named-and-optional-arguments-in-c-4-0.aspx
>
>Also, for those of us who have worked on major rewrites already, it's a little late in the game. Still welcome though. :o)

"Betterness" is now a word?