>That is just plain silly, not to mention evading the issue.
>
>You are the one who evades the issue. This is the second direct question I have posed to you that you have declined to answer. The first was whether or not you felt guilty about heaping over 3 trillion dollars in debt on your daughters' heads because of Obama's huge budget. Perhaps you have been watching too much MSNBC.

I very watch very little television news on any channel. A wasteland IMO.

The fallacy in what you say is that the budget is all going to turn into debt. If the economy turns around, tax receipts and so forth will go up to at least partially offset the spending increases. The idea isn't to blow 3 trillion dollars.

What was the other direct question?