>but evolving to a point where teaching includes abnormal behavior as the norm
>
>Could you please define what you mean about "abnormal behavior"?
>
>If you don't beleive in scientific studies, that's your problem. But it doesn't mean that the students shouldn't learn the truth in school.



If you look at society as a whole, homosexual behavor is antinorm; pedophilia is antinorm; beastiality is antinorm and so goes the same with the rest of the paraphilia behaviors. If you consider one as normal behavior, you then must consider the rest as norm.


What is scientific about the global warming studies? It is merely conjecture by a group of renegade quasi-scientists looking for funding for their research. Global warming has been shown to be pure junk science on a number of fronts; however, there is a vociferous minority with a huge political agenda to push green technology. I am in favor of reducing emissions, cleaning up the water, etc, but there is a right way to go about it and scare tactics and intimidation of children is not the way to go.

As far as truth, there are an equal number of opposite studies available proving the opposite point, so how do you define truth? Liberals are not the arbiters of truth and prevailing beliefs and conjecture do not equal truth.