>>>>>I don't think I said "no dissent"; I did say "no controversy." >>>>> >>>>>Tamar >>>> >>>>I missed that distinction earlier. My apologies. >>> >>>Yep. It certainly changes the entire meaning. >>> >>>Controversy: A dispute, especially a public one, between sides holding opposing views >>> >>>There certainly is none of that because Tamar said so. >> >>What I said is that the study shows that there is on controversy _in the scientific community_. IMO, the reason that there's controversy in the broader community is the media acting as if there's scientific controversy. >> >>Tamar > >What do you consider the 'scientific community?' Climatologists? > >For your reading pleasure: >http://www.americandailyreview.com/home-features-articles-blog/2009/6/1/the-corruption-of-science.html
"Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent." -- Isaac Asimov "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right." -- Isaac Asimov
Neither a despot, nor a doormat, be
Every app wants to be a database app when it grows up
