>>I haven't said it was applied to your code. I did create a bigger routine using your code as part of it and then we were running it from a session based class there we did some processing as well.
>>
>>The result was very strange - instead of the number of records we were supposed to get we were getting much smaller number of records in the resulting Excel file (the cursor was produced with the correct number of records).
>>
>>I was unable to find the bug myself and Boris who helped me testing the routine was unable to duplicate the problem on his site.
>>
>>It is more than likely that the problem is in my additions - I just can not test it anymore.
>
>I remember it clearly that I provided you sample code showing it is reliable with large amounts of data and the problem should be in your "modifications". What Alex was referring to was my routine not yours modified routine, no? Then "It is not reliable" refers to my routine, no?
>Cetin

No.