>
>I totally agree with Scot! VFP is 32 bit & 95 is
>32 bit -- WFW is 16 bit. I know some people who
>do not have anything nice to say about Win32s.
>True 32 bit seems to be not only faster but much
>more reliable.
>
>Tom

Thank you for your reply. As I tell Scot, I am worried about Win95 reliability. Have you any problem with Win95? However, I think I will go on with Win95. The problem I have to prove that Win95 is better and more reliable than WFW. Do you have any sources that I will find information to inform my project team.

Pium :-)