>Don't you believe there is such a thing as inalienable rights, not limited to U.S. citizens or narrowly defined by U.S. statutes? I do.
>
>"Narrowly-defined"????? ROFLMAO!!!!!
>
>This sounds like the same kind of rhetoric that characterized "history of paying bills, steady income" as "arbitrary and unreasonable" credit standards. <s>
OK, leave out the word "narrowly." My point remains the same.
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only