>>It's absurd that we're imprisoning suspects without giving them the opportunity to demonstrate their innocence
>>
>>So long as it's a military tribunal, and they are not permitted on American soil, that's fine. But once again, not a single act/law/coventant that's been mentioned is applicable here. These individuals are often not part of any nation-state.
>
>We have no business taking people from their homes and expecting other countries to then bear the burden of providing a place for them. If we think the people need to be imprisoned, we'd better be willing to provide the prisons.
>
>FWIW, we did imprison enemy soldiers _in this country_ during WWII. That seemed to work. We're also imprisoning some pretty bad people already. If we don't think we can properly keep these people locked up, then we have a much bigger problem than having enemies.
>

The people we imprisoned during WWII almost unanimously were welcomed back home by their respective countries (the ones that signed the Geneva accords and who put these people IN UNIFORM).

Please list the countries who want to welcome the gitmo detainees home (not to just jail/torture/execute them).

>Tamar