>>As to competence, how about Sotomayor's 60% reversal rate? I would say that puts her in the incompetent category with a slam dunk. Forget her blatant sexism and racism, she simply is not good enough to be one of the Supremes. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/may/27/60-reversal-of-sotomayor-rulings-gives-fodder-to-f/
>
>That's a misleading statistic. Five (yes, just 5) of her rulings have gone to the Supreme Court and they overturned 3 of them. What about the hundreds that either didn't go to the court or were refused cert?
>
>Tamar

Hundreds of what? If you mean court decisions, then Supreme Court simply has no means to take low court cases in such quantities.