>>Being searched by police, well, she would be searched by a female officer.
>
>I guess I didn't used the right word again, sorry. I meant a criminal who is in liberty. How do you identify him/her if (s)he hide behind a burka? How do you post a police photo?
>
>>Go into a girl's restroom? Before men go into women's restrooms they call into the restroom to ensure it is empty first. Just because you are wearing a burkha doesn't mean you've lost your vocal cords.
>
>Surely another translation problem. I'm a man and a voyeur. I want to go in the women restroom or changing room without being caught. I put a burka, I go in and doesn't speak.
>
>>Security cameras? That is a part of the risk we take in order to uphold our religious freedom. Or are all of your arguments implying that a man would be wearing a burkha disguised as a woman?
>
>Some of them, yes.
>
>>Gee, I don't know. How many men go around disguising themselves as priests? That would take a lot less effort.
>
>They would still be recognizable disguised as a priest.

So, it is ok to restrict religous freedoms because someone might hide behind that same right to commit a crime?