Did you just deride 3 sources as blowhards and then cite 2 blogs as counterpoint? Most amusing. ;)

>>http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124597505076157449.html
>
>The WSJ opinion page, an Australian Senator, Dr. Ian Plimer and {laughing} Jim Inhofe. Some party! lol
>
>Stack blowhards high enough and you'll finally reach a... uh, well nothing actually. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moralistic_fallacy)
>
>However, I find the blowhards on "the other side" much less credible because they, it truth, are really sinister, hate capitalism, just want to scare and control people, and ultimately destroy everything all the good right-thinking people have worked so hard and thanklessly to create, all the while sneakily contributing to creeping socialism via their "bad science".
>
>Here "they" are, picking on poor lil' 'ol virtuous Dr. Plimer specifically:
>http://scienceblogs.com/deltoid/2009/05/an_astronomer_reviews_ian_plim.php
>
>And (do these fools never give up?), here they are slamming the slammers:
>http://www.desmogblog.com/slamming-the-climate-skeptic-scam
>
>Two links and I'm exhausted -- it was really hard to locate them. ;-) Some day! Some day it will all be finally proven a great big hoax, won't it? Pull enough threads and the sweater will unravel, fall, and show the naked emperor. It's either that or just accept being fooled. That tact really makes *you* the scientist, not "them". Who'd knit such a farcical costume anyway? Haters, that's who! They just hate us and our way of life and that's just wrong because we're right and good. You'll *all* see it someday! Unless Jesus comes back first. Not to change the subject, but then none of this will have mattered if Jesus comes back. Problem solved. Maybe we needn't bother now? haha :-)