>>>>>>>>>>>>>>You may have topped yourself that one. As Nick was saying of socialism, a lot of people who toss that word around should understand it a little better.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>I understand exactly what that word means. As a matter of fact, in a thread sometime earlier in the year, I posted several links to the definition of fascism. Do a little research and search for those links. Since you are not working right now, you should have plenty of time in which to do so.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>You really are a nasty piece of work.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>The only difference I read is that you couch your insults while Marcia is totally up front with hers.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Do I make ad hominen remarks to her? She often slips little stink bombs about my drinking problem and being out of work into replies to me.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>I did not state that either you or she made 'ad hominen' remarks to each other. You both do however, insult each other. Your insults do not go unnoticed though. You do it to others as well, not just Marcia. You just are sneaky about it; but I think most folks here are intelligent enough that reading the comment they can see the insult in it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>I never noticced any intentional insults in Mike's posts. What he got in this thread was precalculated intentional insult.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>British have saying like;
>>>>>>>>>'Real gentleman should never loose his temper'
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>However in this case I understand Mike's reaction. He was not really left with much space to keep it civil.
>>>>>>>>>Depite all bad and crises that are happening to him, MikeB IS a gentlmen. Hi might have overreacted, but he should not have
>>>>>>>>>been put into this position at first place.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I think perhaps you miss the subleties of the language then. That's what I meant when I wrote that Marcia's insults were put out there in black and white but Mike's were always couched. Despite his denial, based on his posts, Mike is evidently a very intelligent person. More intelligent than the average person so I am pretty sure he knows very well when he does it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I can't say that I understand these linguistics either, by similarly obvious reason. At the same time, I see some other difference: Marcia emotional reactions are based on real facts from Mike's life, while Mike emotional reactions are based on simple inference about Marcia, i.e. they are essentially imaginary. Generally speaking, insults tend to contain imaginary part.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I don't know about that. When I get aggravated at Marcia it is almost always when she comes across as heartless and selfish. The feverish attacks on Barack Obama also get under my skin, as I believe they are intended to. And of course I don't like it when she takes gratuitous swipes at me. I don't do that to her. What I say to her is in direct response to her posts. There are a couple of things I could throw in her face, too, but I don't.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I know I should let it go. Healthier that way.
>>>>>
>>>>>As you probably understand I respectfully disagree, i.e. I saw on some occasions that you attacked Marcia in cruel and unusual way. It is highly regretful that you consider critical remarks about current administration as a justification for personal attacks.
>>>>
>>>>Maybe I was drunk and don't remember (definitely possible) but don't remember any cruel or unusual attacks on her. If I did, this is reason #704 to stay sober.
>>>
>>>That was my thought as a possibility, but I was not going to mention it. I didn't want you to take it as an ad homien remark because I would not have intended it that way. (Especially since that was a part of this discussion)
>>
>>No ad homien attacks, you ;-)
>>
>>I am in a very good mood today, as you can probably tell.
>
>Can't let that happen.
>
>I'm here. That ought to take care of it.

Not a chance. We have always gotten along fine, haven't we, despite our respective crazy politics? ;-)