>> But the main problem, as I see it, is the documentation. Maybe you could have some influence on the wording and explain this behaviour a little more in detail (just as you did here in the thread). Is there already a KB article about VarType()? I think this would be a good idea.
>
>Christof

I agree. I'll write a KB article on it ASAP. I'll let you know the URL for it when it's posted. I'll also pass along the info so that the documentation is updated for the next version. In the mean time, we can use the KB to point to people that start another thread like this.