>I think such a thing as human rights SHOULD BE at the top of the list.
>
>Sorry Victor, but 9/11 changed the rules. As far as I'm concerned, we weren't half as nasty as we should have been after 9/11....a proper response would have been one that would have made the two we dropped on Japan feel like a slap on the wrist by comparison. Just image how much better off we'd be as a nation, had our response been swift and blinding, with a goal of completely wiping out those who brought about the biggest massacre on U.S. soil.
>
>Once again...no attacks on U.S. soil after 9/11 - something Mr. Obama doesn't grasp.

Just because there was no attacks since 9/11 doesn't mean that there would of been if we didn't kidnap, torture, detain without trial, and kill people we thought might be a terrorist. If anything, doing such things would just make the resolve of the real terrorist greater.

It's an interesting statement you make - however there is no evidence to support that these are the things that have prevented attacks.

As far as sending a nuke over to wipe out a whole nation of innocent people - I'm sure you're joking as that is simply absurd.