Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Someone needs to set this man's priorities...
Message
From
14/07/2009 03:01:18
 
 
General information
Forum:
Politics
Category:
News
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
01411813
Message ID:
01412147
Views:
51
>I'm not sharing your views on this. I agree in theory yet the big attack due to libs in power hasn't actually happened. If and when it does (God forbid), then we have something to analyze,
>
>Hmmm....can't say I agree. it actually HAS happened. There's plenty of data to analyze....look at how much Clinton/Gore's national security policy was more focused on trans-national environmental initiatives.
>
>Clinton repeatedly ignored recommendations from FBI regarding profiling of organizations connected directly to Hamas....he and Gore were far more concerned about the social ramifications of profiling Islamic organizations.
>
>Sure, Clinton would sometimes talk tough....but was so intent on making nice with Iran that he never took action. For instance, when Hezbelloh (sponsored by Iran) detonated a 5,000 pound truck bomb near Khobar Towers (where we had U.S. military barracks) that killed 19 of our boys, Clinton shouted a few nasty words, vowed revenge, but didn't do anything. He was far too concerned about "civil lilberties".
>
>And then you had our friend, Attorney General Jamie Gorelick, who successfully strengthened the "wall of separation" between intelligence and law-enforcement. (And by a miraculous coincidence, it occured around the same time the CIA was building a strong case regarding Gore being the bag-man for the Chinese government). One of the biggest tragedies is that this "wall of separation" not only negatively affected the investigations that would have implicated Gore and the Democratic party - it may have kept the CIA from learning about the 9/11 plot.
>
>Former adminstration officials felt that Clinton spent less attention on national defense than any another President. There are studies that concluded that Clinton's failure to confront foreign terror after the 1993 WTC attack contributed to 9/11. Clinton naively thought that since the Cold War was over, the drastic cuts in the U.S. military were safe.
>
>All these things had one objective....to mitigate the risk of Clinton having to act. Clinton was the world's biggest chicken-____ when it came to confronting any type of conflict. And so his goal was to remove the processes that would even expose such a conflict.
>
>So we had the libs in power for 8 years....and there's substantial evidence of the ramifications.


Please.More of this stuff I love it. Clinton and Gore where Chinese agents. Are you on some sort of medication ?
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform