> Read it again. Not only that, but you do know the definition of 'hope,' right?
>
>YOU read it again.
>
>Why don't you just admit you got caught up in all the seashells and balloons of Rock Star Obama, and that translated into hope (false hope, as he never brought anything concrete to the table to indicate actual cause for optimism).
>
>Admit it....you made a mistake, but you're seeing it now.

No, I won't. I still have hopes that he might improve foreign relations. I don't see it happening, but I hope it does. Half of the problem with the economy is due to the media over-reporting on the dreadful state and the public reacting to it and escalating the problem. He may ruin this country in other ways in the process but I won't bother to go into all of his policies I disagree with because I've done that already in the past.

Really Kevin, are you capable of posting anything that is not antagonistic? Leave me off your list in the future please. I don't know how or why you chose to focus on a couple of writings in all of the comments I've posted, but you obviously enjoy doing that and then interpret it the way you wish regardless of its meaning. Then you pound it relentlessly until the other person agrees or just stops playing your game which you decide to interpret as defeat. I just don't want to play the game and I'm not going to.