>>We better hurry up and shove through cap-and-tax before the citizenry realizes that climate change "science" is not worth the hard drive space the 100% incorrect computer models are stored in.
>>
>>http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/vaop/ncurrent/abs/ngeo578.html
>>http://news.google.com/news?ned=us&q=dickens+palaeocene
>>
>>After all it's all about "global governance". Right Al?
>>http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/gore_global_government/2009/07/13/234995.html
>>
>>When I talk about the ultimate goal of environmentalists being the subjugation of the citizenry to world socialism I am not speaking metaphorically. The leaders of the movement admit it freely.
>
>"Ultimate goal" depends on how radical the environmentalists are. Radical ones believe a "sustainable" human global population level is that of pre-agricultural hunters/gatherers, c.100M IIRC. To them, it's a sad necessity that over 6B people will ultimately have to die ...

...and that 6B doesn't include the enlightened, like themselves, of course.