>>
>>doh! I thought you meant that your extension method wasn't working.
>
>haha - would I post it if it weren't ?
>
>Something I was thinking about last night ... With this extension method, is there any possible 'conflict' ?
>ie, when I use s.Reverse() it uses my extension method. To have it use the IEnumerable extension method I have to cast it, as in
>

>((IEnumerable<char>)s).Reverse();
>

>
>My em changes the stack whilst the other doesn't.
>
>Just wondering whether there may be any troubles (side effects) ahead with LINQ are so ?
>Since List(T) has a Reverse() that changes the list - I do not think so, ie LINQ works on the interface
>
>Maybe I should rename them to ReverseSequence() or so - just wondering

My gut feeling (not always useful) is that there would NOT be a problem but It would still be better to use something like ReverseSequence() to avoid confusion ?