>So OK, no one should hire T.O. as an English teacher. But he has a point. Michael Vick has paid his debt to society and deserves the chance to come back.
>
>And Roger Goodell is giving him the chance. Goodell could have done much worse than just suspend him for 4 games.
>
>Vick lied to his owner, lied to Goodell, and lied to all his fans. Vick's prison sentence is not related to Goodell's discipline - Goodell is not bound by what the legal system decided for Vick. Goodell has been sending a message to all players - screw up, and you'll be suspended. The man is doing his best to clean up the league.
>
>Were I an owner, even if I DID need a QB, I highly doubt I'd take Vick.

I feel the same way about taking a chance on him.

You make a good point about the four games not being as harsh as it could have been. I didn't catch that is was the suspension T.O. was objecting to. There are some who don't think Vick should be allowed back at all. They are the ones I disagree with.