>>Yesterday I did minor edits to two of my FAQs, and saw them come up to the top of the list, which was not the idea (there was nothing really "new" about the changes). Would it be possible to have an option, to mark edits as minor; or perhaps better the other way round, that an edit (either in FAQs or downloads) must explicitly be marked as a "new version", in order to come to the top of the list?
>
>Yes, should be this way. I think it's currently sorted by the Last Edited date.
It is clear that it is sorted by Last Edited date, but I was suggesting to have an option to override this; such as a checkbox that marks an edit as "minor".
Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)
