>>>Thank Tore and Naomi
>>>
>>>I was trying to use Naomi's idea, but "type" was missing to check if expression is logical
>>>
>>>Moises
>>
>>Naomi?
>>That was the only post she is not here :-))))))))))))))))))))
>
>This is the first thread in a long time without Naomi's presence, but still she gets credit. Maybe she has spritual capabilities?

It was from his other FOR thread. I introduced TYPE test - did I really forget TYPE? Wow, this would be unforgivable.