>>>http://www.physorg.com/news167555163.html
>>
>>I don't believe in Dark Matter.
>>
>>I believe gravity is stronger not because of invisible matter, but because galaxies aren't really as far apart as we think, because we think space is expanding but it isn't.
>
>There is much more evidence for dark matter.
>
>There is the rotation within the galaxies themselves - including our own galaxy - it rotates much faster than it should, for the known mass. Of course you might claim that distance within our galaxy aren't well-known either.


Doesn't it take a million and some years for the galaxy to rotate?

Haven't we known what galaxies are for 80 years?

I have my doubts that there is actual science going on in cosmology.



>There is the evidence from gravitational lensing.
>
>And a few other things which I didn't investigate in detail. For example, the Wikipedia article (on dark matter) mentions "the temperature distribution of hot gas in galaxies and clusters of galaxies" - I am not sure what the reasoning is, behind this.
>
>About the expansion of space... There is even more evidence for that. For a start, the so-called redshift, which is hard to explain in any other way. Then there is the cosmic background radiation, and lots of calculations that indicate that a static universe can't be stable. Problems with entropy, for a start - it just doesn't work.

My rewrite of Hubble's Law predicts redshift, the CMB, and solution to Obler's paradox.