>>My rewrite of Hubble's Law predicts redshift, the CMB, and solution to Obler's paradox.
>
>We know the all radiation disipates at R to the 4th power, so over those distances very little light is getting to us, and with just a handle full of dust distributed over that distance, would stop all of the light from reaching us, this is the main flaw in Olber's paradox, his idea of a long way is a long way out.
R squared, actually - assuming there is no absorbption.
If any energy from the stars is absorbed, it would have to be re-emitted eventually. Not necessarily at the same wavelength - that would depend on the temperature of the dust and gas - but the same amount of energy would have to be emitted again.
Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)
