>>>>>There is no such option in the search anymore.
>>>>
>>>>Then that's a real shame. How on earth am I going to search for any message about "foxpro.h"?!
>>>
>>>May be we just need to ask Michel to re-introduce this type of search back.
>>
>>Ask? It is a requirement. ;)
>>
>>(For those who don't understand the ;) : I once 'required' a response from YAG, assuming - not being a native speaker - that 'to require' is similar to 'to ask'. I was blamed for putting pressure on YAG and it took a while before it became clear that it was mainly a language problem.)
>
>Similar to my own misunderstanding of the word "demand". I thought it meant "require" but learnt that it meant "ask for", like in french.
Does it? I spent this past hour rereading all interesting stuff from thread #
1210085, in search of the original post where I misused 'to require'. That thread also contains the posts (starting with message #
1210672) where people like Terry explained the correct meaning. The subthreat starting with message #
1210672 also contains posts about the misuse of 'demand'. You are a major player there. :)
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
